anyway, talking about pubic hair, and armpit hair. there are quite interesting stuffs to talk about actually. prolly controversial to talk about. but it's just hair, that sprouts during everyone's puberty (ala pubic hair?).
i noticed: there is the "fuzz" kind, the "rebonded" kind, and the "normal curly" kind. at least, these 3 kinds are to my own knowledge.
(FUZZ: is so kinky or wiry that when you look at it from a distance, it's just a fuzz like a blurry cloud. REBONDED: as the name suggests, the hair is long and relatively, straight. with few kinks. NORMAL CURLY: curly and pretty short. the in-between of fuzz and rebonded)
no matter what kinda type of armpit hair it belongs to, i think it should be removed. pluck, shave or wax. just get it off. and i say, that applies to guys and girls alike. (what's so 'man' about having armpit hair?) armpit hair serves no purpose but to trap bacteria as you sweat and make yourself stink. and i don't know about stone age era, but now, i don't think armpit hair is appealing to the eyes at all. and i seriously don't think it's returning to fashion either. what's irksome is that some guys who have bushes beneath their arms still wear singlets and flash them (as they reach over their lunch to get chilli sauce or have their hands supporting the back of their heads as they talk to you [but you can't help but feel disgusted and distracted by the two dark bushes staring back at you]
there are women who do not shave and still where sleeveless tops. i'd seen a female lecturer and a female tutor (who also don't wear a bra nor any makeup; so i think she's really au-natural, or a feminist) who have flashed their tufts of pit-hair to a whole class (who were more fixated at the tufts than what she was saying).
i don't know ever since when that armpit hair was undesirable.
but i sure do not want any of them in my food. my mom told me once that her friend was eating a pack-away container of man-made noodles bought from a stall at the coffeeshop near my place. and she found a piece of curly-wurly hair sitting nicely on top of her noodles, welcoming her to her dinner. she lost her appetite.
i think that story spread to quite a number of people around my place. because... not too long after, the stall had changed its owner.
see? armpit hair does no good.
the male cleavage, they say. tho i wonder what's really sexy about those bushes. this ad picture was taken in the answer to....
this female (Gucci) ad version. (nice bod, with nicely trimmed bush.) a Gucci pube, how's that? a branded pube. chic. (the replies in the link of the advert said G Spot. hoho)
it's possible to dye your pubes. so if it's dyed green, wouldn't it be a real bush. ah haha...
i think the bush down there should be trimmed or shaved too. not really nice to see a guy or a girl donning their flashy swimsuits with ultra good bods, to have only tufts of hair peeking out at the in-between of their legs. turn off. worse still, after they come out of the swimming pools, their wet hair lay in streaks stuck to the sides of their legs beneath their triangular bottom.
anyway, what's the use of such hair at these regions? they don't have any uses, right? i doubt it's keeping us warm at those places. i think the last body part that a guy wants to keep warm is there. hahaha.
(ah, done my research, and here are the answers to my questions: the functions and yada yada about pubic hair! HERE.)
but i still think they're to be removed tho.
No comments:
Post a Comment